|
Nigeria
anti-gay bill threatens democracy-activists
1st
Mar 2007- Abuja - A bill that would ban same-sex marriages in
Nigeria threatens democratic progress because it would also restrict
freedom of speech and association, the campaign group Human Rights Watch
said today.
Homosexuality is
already illegal in Nigeria but the government introduced a bill last
year explicitly to outlaw gay marriage in response to its legalisation
in some Western countries. Offenders would go to prison for five years.
Human Rights Watch
said the bill had implications beyond the issue of same-sex marriage
because it would also punish anyone who advocates the rights of gay and
lesbian people and would silence any discussion of the topic.
"A sweepingly
homophobic bill being fast-tracked through Nigeria’s National Assembly
threatens human rights and Nigeria’s democratic progress," the group
said in a letter to legislators calling on them to reject the bill.
"This law strikes
a blow not just at the rights of lesbian and gay people but at the civil
and political freedoms of all Nigerians," Human Rights Watch said.
The group said the
bill would impose a five-year jail term on anyone involved in gay clubs,
processions and meetings, or "publicity and public show of same-sex
amorous relationship directly or indirectly in public and in private".
The bill has not
been controversial within Nigeria, a fervently religious country where
the vast majority of people consider homosexuality immoral. The bill has
received little publicity and prompted almost no debate.
Nigeria is split
about evenly between Muslims and Christians, and both communities
condemn homosexuality. At a public hearing about the bill at the
National Assembly on February 14, most participants offered their
support. Some human rights activists spoke against the bill but they
were in the minority and their views did not reflect mainstream
attitudes.
On February 23,
four United Nations envoys condemned the bill as a violation of
international human rights law. They said it amounted to an "absolutely
unjustified intrusion" into an individual’s right to privacy.
|